Lean Six Sigma training
RecommendedIASSC recommends training from a qualified institution, Lean Six Sigma trainer or corporate program.

Validates knowledge of Lean Six Sigma problem solving, covering DMAIC phases, lean tools and statistical analysis.
The exam checks that you can choose and apply the right tool at each DMAIC phase, with a heavy share of statistics, including non-parametric tests. It is closed book, so you need to know which test or chart fits a situation without looking anything up.
IASSC draws about 20 questions from each of the five phases (100 scored in total).
Example scenario: A process has 250 defects across 1,000 units with 5 opportunities per unit. How would you express its performance as DPMO, and why is that better than a defect percentage for comparing processes?
Example scenario: A gauge study shows that most of the variation in readings comes from different operators measuring the same part. Which part of the measurement system is the problem, and what would you do first?
Example scenario: Two shifts’ cycle times are clearly skewed, and the samples are small. Which family of tests would you choose to compare their medians, and why not a t-test?
Example scenario: A regression of cycle time on batch size has a strong R-squared, but the residuals fan out as batch size grows. What does that tell you about using the model for prediction?
Example scenario: You want to detect a small, sustained shift in a process mean quickly. Which control chart suits that better than a standard Xbar chart, and what is its trade-off?
Official IASSC Green Belt Body of Knowledge · BoK v3.2
Read a short scenario or data summary and choose the one correct answer from the options.
Cycle times from two shifts are clearly skewed and the samples are small. Which test compares them without assuming normal data?
Mann-Whitney test. It compares two groups without assuming the data are normal, which suits skewed data and small samples.
Read a statement and decide whether it is true or false.
True or false: a process can be stable on a control chart and still fail to meet customer specifications.
True. Control limits describe what the process does, while specifications describe what the customer needs; the two are separate.
Buy an on-demand voucher, then schedule your exam. For the online route, an IASSC proctor meets you in a virtual testing room, checks your ID by webcam and stays with you through the exam. IASSC also lists test centres and accredited providers.
Read the Body of Knowledge and try the Evaluation Exam first, so you can see which phases are weakest. Spend most of your time on the sections where you score lowest, which is often the statistics.
Most candidates spend 40–90 hours. Plan for the low end if you already use these tools at work; add time if hypothesis testing or regression are unfamiliar.
There is no IASSC textbook, so use the free Body of Knowledge as your syllabus and pick one main course that follows it.
Add the non-parametric tests. ASQ-based books give them little space, so learn Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, Mood’s median and Friedman from your course or another source.
IASSC’s own Evaluation Exam is the closest practice. Use it to find weak phases, then retake it after studying.
The exam is closed book. Follow the checklist for your delivery route.
One passer retook IASSC’s Evaluation Exam five times in the 20-day window, noting why each missed question was wrong, and says each retake included some different questions. They found the official exam harder than the Evaluation Exam.
A passer who studied from the ASQ handbook says it barely covers Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, Mood’s median and Friedman, and thinks these were a large part of the exam. Another passer says no single course covered the whole IASSC outline.
Passers say the exam asks which tool to use and why rather than formula recall. Two questions covered the history of Six Sigma, and one passer lists Z values and the regression coefficient as the main calculations.